that was a good strategy

General strategy discussion.

Moderator: Moderator

Amor1993
4 star member
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:02 am

Postby Amor1993 » Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:39 am

yea there are a lot of bullies out there
Showle
1 star member
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 6:14 pm

Postby Showle » Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:00 pm

That was fantastic. That's what poker is really all about. anyone can figure odds and read behavior. You sized up your table and took advantage of their weakness. very impressive.

Maybe having 3 $20 stt open isnt a good idea - maybe i'll swith to 1 $50 stt.
Amor1993
4 star member
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:02 am

Postby Amor1993 » Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:10 pm

i think that's a great idea perplexy
Disper
2 star member
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 6:53 am

Postby Disper » Sat Aug 13, 2005 3:51 am

Yes I am in total agreement.  You played "strategy" not collusion.  Collusion, as was said before takes two or more people discussing their cards as they are being played or discussing who they are going after and gang up on that person.  This was total strategic playing on your part.  However, it could have backfired.  For instance if all of a sudden the girl started getting the cards to win with (as sometimes happens) you could have been taken out.  But again that's gambling.
Restong
2 star member
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:03 pm

Postby Restong » Sat Aug 27, 2005 2:47 am

Dude that is the sickest thing ive ever heard/ Way to go.  I gotta try that. Its totally righ tof you to do that its strategey. Good Strategey. GL latter man
Hodauld
1 star member
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 12:40 am

Postby Hodauld » Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:40 am

at a single table who knows how people actually play        i think it was luck this time but it was an okay decision     next time you need to really know who is actually weak player but nice strategy
Exas1995
2 star member
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 12:39 pm

Postby Exas1995 » Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:12 am

1.       it takes 2 to make collusion, so if the girl in question did not know what you were doing then there was no crime.

2.       you took a big chance by leaving anyone in the tourney that you could have removed. if you could take out the big mouth while protecting the girl you could have done it in heads up.

3.       no survivors.........no friends (during the game)

:lol:
Iteress
1 star member
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 9:09 pm

Postby Iteress » Sun Dec 04, 2005 1:22 am

you absolutely played correctly, taking advantage of an opponent's tight play who was probably waiting, assuming your aggression would eventually take out the shortstack. you formulated a strategy where you would either win or take 3rd, which means you were really gambling

Return to “General strategy”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron